And, I think it's cruel to subject pets, with them being captive in your environment, to secondhand smoke. It can't in any way be good for them if it downright doesn't give them cancer or respiratory problems.
I wasn’t blathering to you, why would you even think that? I was simply giving my ancectode regarding second hand smoke. Post hoc ergo Propter hoc is the most common logical fallacy and it permeates peoples thinking on just about everything.
Bad genes, on the other hand, is an entirely different issue. Don't even begin to blather to me that bad genes do not often also cause some very serious mental issues!
According to the WHO study, secondhand smoke is harmless, BUT no one, to my knowledge, ever suggested that smoking is good for you.