Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JimSEA
Continual attacks on the theory of evolution should be answered.

... but perhaps not necessarily in this manner, with "embarrassingly" and "fantasy", etc. I prefer a steadfast adherence to the unique status of Darwinian Evolution as a scientific explanation for the Origin of Species.

My doctrine: "Creationism does not offer a scientific alternative to Evolution."

11 posted on 08/12/2014 8:20:38 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dr_lew

why would creationism find a need to define what no one truly understands?

let the evolutionist float inane non theories....

one need not theorize about alleged CHANCE evolution

Creation dates back to....DAY ZERO.....

as nothing..... from nothing leaves nothing...ALWAYS...everything did not SPRING FORTH from NOTHING


22 posted on 08/12/2014 8:29:14 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: dr_lew
My doctrine: "Creationism does not offer a scientific alternative to Evolution."

Perhaps, but evolution (the theory) itself is not scientific.

205 posted on 08/13/2014 5:50:25 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson