Well gee, it seems a decent picture can be taken of the Mars landscape, which means they can also take good pictures of the Moon....I guess all the controversy can be cleared up tomorrow.
Not holding my breath.
You have to ask yourself, if you think logically or have a smidgen of honesty, why they are not giving us good photos of all the controversial tin foil hat picture sites but we get great pictures of barren landscapes that nobody is dying to see or has had any interest in in the last 20 years.
Want to make Hoagland look like an idiot then give us this resolution photo of all his picture sites.
Hoaxland saddled on the so-called face on Mars, and that formation *has* been photographed at much higher resolution, showing it to be a natural formation, with no sign of the Viking images’ 32 pixels of the pareidolia-fueled “face”. Despite that, he’s still harping on artificiality on Mars. It’s nonsense.