To: LibWhacker
2 posted on
08/10/2014 9:18:52 AM PDT by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: LibWhacker
Personally, I don’t think you could get this to work in large enough scale to be usable.
Back 20 years ago, IBM spelled out IBM in, I think gold atoms using an electron microscope and some other equipment.
Creating functional molecular bonds is more difficult than just moving atoms around.
Interesting idea though
3 posted on
08/10/2014 9:33:17 AM PDT by
Zathras
To: LibWhacker
Daniel 12:4 “But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased..” KJV
We have a long way to go but there is plenty of time....
4 posted on
08/10/2014 9:44:27 AM PDT by
Fungi
(Do not read this post.)
To: LibWhacker
The narcos are working on this now.
6 posted on
08/10/2014 10:11:01 AM PDT by
Thud
To: LibWhacker
Interesting article. You would have to program for a lot of factors, such as steric hindrance. That is why plants and animals hold the key today to new drugs: They can make much more complicated 3-D compounds today than a human can make in the lab.
8 posted on
08/10/2014 10:25:37 AM PDT by
mfish13
(Elections have Consequences.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson