“why would the suspect driver not be able to see you?”
A million reasons. From lighting, to other cars, to the fact that visibility to the right in those cars sux. It could also be the fact that nobody expects to see a guy walking down the track in the middle of a race.
The vehicle isn’t a suspect, your judgement is. You’re building assumption upon assumption upon assumption and then declaring it fact.
The only fact here is the young man got out of his car, acted angry, and stepped into traffic on a race track.
Are you not disputing the suspect vehicle had time to rev his engine and break traction at nearly the point of impact with the victim?
It could also be the fact that nobody expects to see a guy walking down the track in the middle of a race.
A slight issue with your comment here.
Did the suspect driver not know a quick lap prior he had sent the victim vehicle into the wall?
Should this have not caused the suspect vehicle to proceed very slowly as you come around the track, knowing damn well there could be debris, vehicles or victims on the track?
No, they are strictly based on the video evidence, the same evidence investigators will be looking at.
No?
Go ahead and answer the questions above.
...with a yellow flag though which means caution. You’re making it sound like the victim was strolling on a race track during the race with the green flag with the drivers driving at top speed. The drivers should have been slowing down not revving the throttle during a yellow caution flag. Stewart is done, finished finito!