Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

Correct me if I’m wrong but it seems to me that the spacecraft will not be in a “gravitational” orbit at all. It will have to continuously expend fuel to remain in a circular orbit. Weak gravity and all that.


4 posted on 08/08/2014 12:02:19 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: InterceptPoint

I don’t believe you are wrong. An object that small can’t exert much more gravitational pull than the Empire State Building.


5 posted on 08/08/2014 12:05:14 PM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint
There is plenty of gravity for these two objects to orbit one another. Remember, any two objects with mass attract each other gravitationally no matter how small they are and no matter how far apart they are (ignore quantum theory; these things aren't quanta). So, in principle, any two objects can be made to orbit one another. Of course, there are other considerations: Are we in a perfect vacuum? No. Are there other objects around? Yes. Etc. But here, there are no major obstacles to putting Rosetta in orbit around 67P.
20 posted on 08/08/2014 3:47:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: InterceptPoint
They used minimal fuel getting there. It took 10 years. At least 3 gravitational assists from earth and another from mars.


23 posted on 08/08/2014 5:26:10 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("Moderates" are lying manipulative bottom feeding scum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson