Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: windcliff

If he wanted to have a quiet meal, he should have gone to an actual restaurant, not a fast-food joint. Apparently he could afford to.


21 posted on 08/07/2014 2:20:32 PM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Veto!

He didn’t say he required a quiet meal, he complained, and took appropriate action, against an assault on his senses. There’s a difference.


58 posted on 08/07/2014 3:12:14 PM PDT by Shimmer1 (Ok, the joke's over. Bring back the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Veto!

He could have had a short lunch time. Real sit down restaurants have their fair share of bratty kids. I think (probably wrong) it was an Olive Garden that banned the little monsters last year. Just saw this one banning noisy kids - http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2014/07/31/ca-restaurant-effectively-bans-kids-with-sign/

I’m on a very frugal budget but I would have brought every pie in the joint and told the mother and her potty mouthed kid exactly why I was doing it. We would have to scratch bread and milk off the grocery list for the next two months, but it would soooo be worth it.


74 posted on 08/07/2014 3:28:21 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson