Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt

“I really needs to be said? Monkeys are not people. They cannot own stuff.”

Correct.

“The copyright belongs to the photographer.”

Incorrect, or rather, inaccurate. Technically, there was no “photographer” for this photograph, as it was taken without human intervention. Therefore, it’s not possible to copyright it.


42 posted on 08/06/2014 2:29:37 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

So, as a photographer, I do not own the copyright to any of the photos hat I make through remote triggers or timed shutters.

The photographer placed the camera in the position. It was his equipment and the image was made at his intent.

The argument made is just silly in an attempt to hijack his property rights.


44 posted on 08/06/2014 2:44:34 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman

I would beg to differ. The photograph was taken using the photographer’s equipment- therefore, it was a work for hire, therefore the photographer owns the copyright.


65 posted on 08/06/2014 6:28:19 PM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel (a government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson