Wikipedia?
Word is that a lot of Schultz’s notes are of what was asked of him by investigators (the pandora’s box reference). In other words, the state asked him if this was a “pandora’s box?”...and he took note of it.
Like I said - if they have such strong cases against GS/GS/TC, then please bring on the trial (they’re all tried together). With MM as the state’s star witness, I don’t see this happening though. And it’s been nearly 3 years.
And if you doubt me about Sue/Paul Kelly/Wick Sollers vs. the ncaa, you aren’t paying attention (and you don’t know their reputations). They don’t mess around and they don’t lose. They’re in discovery and the ncaa can’t find their ass w/ a compass.
They (Emmert) took away wins and specifically mentioned Joe in their ridiculous sanction display. Big mistake. Those wins are worth a lot of money. If the ncaa wants to settle (if I’m Paul Kelly), I’d say $500M, formal apology, reinstate wins, and mow Sue’s lawn for a year.
Freeh report:
-----------------------------------------------------------
The most saddening finding by the Special Investigative Counsel is the total and consistent disregard by the most senior leaders at Penn State for the safety and welfare of Sandusky's child victims. As the Grand Jury similarly noted in its presentment,1 there was no "attempt to investigate, to identify Victim 2, or to protect that child or any others from similar conduct except as related to preventing its re-occurrence on University property." Four of the most powerful people at The Pennsylvania State University - President Graham B. Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary C. Schultz, Athletic Director Timothy M. Curley and Head Football Coach Joseph V. Paterno - failed to protect against a child sexual predator harming children for over a decade. These men concealed Sandusky's activities from the Board of Trustees, the University community and authorities. They exhibited a striking lack of empathy for Sandusky's victims by failing to inquire as to their safety and well-being, especially by not attempting to determine the identity of the child who Sandusky assaulted in the Lasch Building in 2001. Further, they exposed this child to additional harm by alerting Sandusky, who was the only one who knew the child's identity, of what McQueary saw in the shower on the night of February 9, 2001. These individuals, unchecked by the Board of Trustees that did not perform its oversight duties, empowered Sandusky to attract potential victims to the campus and football events by allowing him to have continued, unrestricted and unsupervised access to the University's facilities and affiliation with the University's prominent football program. Indeed, that continued access provided Sandusky with the very currency that enabled him to attract his victims.
“In other words, the state asked him if this was a “pandora’s box?”...and he took note of it.”
The ‘state’ did not admit to asking him about ‘Pandora’s box’ ....