Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia
Wow. Just wow. So the judge, who admitted to being ignorant of the real methods used to gather the intelligence, just throws out the 4th amendment without ceremony.

The defense should have responded with what I used to, which would inevitably get the judge too upset to speak for a short period of time:

"Objection, your 'honor'. Court may not insert personal opinion in lieu of the facts in this matter."

Be prepared to be threatened with "Contempt", however.

46 posted on 08/06/2014 8:45:06 AM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzzle-em's trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Utilizer

To be fair, the government is guilty of withholding evidence here. They are not revealing their methodology which is criminal. Is it even legal to use illegal means to do something?


47 posted on 08/06/2014 8:52:07 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson