Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
The matter of the government subsidizing corn resulting in making HFCS cheaper than sucrose or other more natural sweeteners is a direct consequence of their following the Communist Manifesto.

Ummmmmm......government subsidies of corn did not make HFCS cheaper than sugar.

Government protecting sugar producers by restricting sugar imports made sugar so expensive, that HFCS became an economical substitute.

Why won't you explain how quickly sucrose is broken down in your gut into those evil simple sugars?

Is it that you don't know?

Or did you find the answer and realize it destroys your claims?

89 posted on 08/04/2014 4:39:35 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Science is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot

Just what are you referring to? I’m trying to make sense of what you say here.

All I came in to this discussion saying was that HCl degrades simple sugars into 5-HMF. I said nothing about breaking down sucrose into glucose and fructose. So what are my “claims” in this respect? Most simple sugars, and some complex sugars, are reducing sugars; sucrose is not, and you’d need an excess of HCl to continue a reaction with the monosaccharides into the corresponding aldehydes after the glycosidic bonds of sucrose are hydrolyzed (and my guess is that you would have a severe case of indigestion at that level).

For the record, it’s a combination of both imposing tariffs and restrictions on sugar imports and subsidization of corn syrup production that renders HFCS cheaper. So I thank you for correcting me on at least that part.


92 posted on 08/04/2014 7:37:09 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson