[jarwulf]

I was speaking in terms of the general population accepting LGBT activism not FR. But I do find it curious that while most here (I think) claim to be okay with gays ‘keeping it to themselves’ they are not quite as tolerant of heterosexual fantasies.

Overall this Fifty Shades thing strikes me as more of a feminist/pc controversy. They hate that a fictional woman dares to want to play a ‘submissive’ role. Introducing the ‘how Christian is it?’ angle is a red herring for whether it deserves special scorn. It isn’t particularly more or less antichristian than typical trashy romance novels nobody cares to think about.

[Rashputin]

There are no, "gays", there are people who have a disordered sexual desire and are attracted to the same sex. At best, they're stricken with more obvious form of sin all men (as in mankind) suffer from, and in general parlance for several hundred years at least they've been known as queers when they act out their disorder.

Changing what you call a disorder that leads to disgusting, anti-Christ, anti-Christian, perversion doesn't change what the resulting perversion really is.

Just so you're aware of the facts as opposed to the popular fantasy.