Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Washi

In your post #23, you pretty much cut the legs off your, “It’s nature, not nurture” argument by pointing out the types of $***heads, unfortunately, who are attracted to this type of dog.
And there’s no excuse for calling another freeper “stupid”.


28 posted on 07/20/2014 9:01:32 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice

Pit bull deniers are stupid, and I’ll say it all day. Their arguments ignore simple rebuttals that but for their boneheadedness they themselves could discover. Such as the long list of “good” pit bulls... Those dogs could have just as easily been beagles or collies. Pit bulls can KiLL children in seconds. Why on Earth would any sane person choose that breed of dog?!


37 posted on 07/20/2014 10:31:45 PM PDT by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: tumblindice; kcvl
The $***heads are attracted to the dogs specifically because they are dangerous and have a well-earned dangerous reputation, so I didn't pretty much cut the legs off of anything.

My "It's the breed, stupid" comment wasn't intended to call a specific Freeper stupid, although it obviously can be taken that way. For that I'm sorry.

Instead, I intended like Carville and Clinton intended it in Clinton's first campaign: "It's the economy, stupid". A phrase that's meant to point out a glaringly obvious truth that shouldn't be overlooked or forgotten.

In the case of put bulls, the glaringly obvious truth(s) is that the dogs are dangerous, can snap at any time, and shouldn't be around kids.

43 posted on 07/21/2014 12:38:13 PM PDT by Washi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson