Social media is too easily manipulated to be considered reliable proof, certainly not before an investigation into the cause of the crash.
The Ukrainian military has to be considered one of the prime suspects as they are known to have BUK missile batteries in the area, and have ‘accidentally’ shot down a commercial airliner before themselves.
An impartial investigation has to include a complete accounting of their weapon systems, starting with the specific missile batteries the Russians asserted were active on July 17th.
ps. all democrats are douches...including corporate ones.
In case you thought all three were false flag photoshops, I even linked the Google Cached page of the very same incriminating post.
Outside of social media, there are also three different Russian propaganda outlets that reported the downing of a AN-26 by the separatists just before reports came out of a passenger airplane missing over Ukraine. All of which I have already linked towards and which they still have up.
All of this clearly self-incriminates the rebels. Please tell me how the Russians self-incriminating themselves this badly and on so many different websites beforehand doesn't collectively constitute reliable proof that they shot it down.
To manipulate all that, you would have to assume that:
a)I'm posting three cleverly Photoshopped images.
b)Google is in on the conspiracy and deliberately archived the Photoshopped self-incriminating post.
c)ITAR-TASS was hacked or tricked into reporting a AN-26 getting shot down by separatists before Malaysia Airlines realized a plane was shot down.
d)RIA Novoski was hacked or tricked into reporting a AN-26 getting shot down by separatists before Malaysia Airlines realized a plane was shot down.
e)Life News was hacked or tricked into reporting a AN-26 getting shot down by separatists before Malaysia Airlines realized a plane was shot down.