Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gil4

Yes but you’re missing the other half.

There are two halves to this.

There would be more senators. Most would be democrats. That is not good.

However there would be more Republican electoral votes.

That is good.

Both sides would win something. Both would lose something.

I think it’s sort of a wash, but it would make sense to me.

Just my personal opinion.

You may completely feel the opposite.


29 posted on 07/18/2014 5:01:07 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Cringing Negativism Network

California law is the electoral votes go to the winner of the popular vote nation wide. If it ever looked like it was going to benefit us our supreme court would declare it unconstitutional in a heartbeat.


32 posted on 07/18/2014 5:10:10 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Yes but you’re missing the other half.”

I didn’t really look at either half. Why should the other states just go along with California’s scheming to increase its influence? What leverage do the have?


39 posted on 07/18/2014 8:25:11 PM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson