1 posted on
07/17/2014 4:05:57 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
So marry your dog now, in 20 years you can get retroactive benefits when the freaks run out of freaky things to legalize.
2 posted on
07/17/2014 4:09:29 PM PDT by
icwhatudo
(Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
To: Olog-hai
No slippery slope here — just a precipice and the abyss.
To: Olog-hai
I have a feeling that this dog doesn’t hunt, in that it would mean money coming out of the state for which they get bupkus.
4 posted on
07/17/2014 4:19:44 PM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
To: Olog-hai
I thought I saw something in the local (Seattle) news a week or two ago that gay marriage was in fact being imposed retroactively for those who had previously enacted “civil unions.” The story said something like, “This week some gays will be officially married whether they realize it or not.”
To: Olog-hai
I thought ex-post facto laws were unconstitutional...
Wait, this is Obama’s amerika... nevermind.
6 posted on
07/17/2014 4:57:12 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Olog-hai
Follow the money.
That's all the queers have ever been after.
7 posted on
07/17/2014 5:23:57 PM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: Olog-hai
Retroactive???
How about all those gay fetuses that have been aborted?
We need reparations. And counseling and education.
To: Olog-hai; GeronL
Mueller was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2001. In 2005, however, Mueller and Stacey learned the diagnosis was wrong and she actually had appendix cancer. Mueller died in 2009 at age 62. Stacey said her death could have been prevented if the original diagnosis had been correct. Mueller sued for malpractice. After her death, a jury issued a $2.4 million verdict in her favor against one of her doctors, while another doctor settled for an undisclosed amount. The trial court and the state Appellate Court, however, ruled against Stacey in her effort to sue a doctor for loss of spousal "consortium," saying Stacey and Mueller weren't married as required under the law at the time of the malpractice. So $2,400,000 + an undisclosed sum wasn't enough money for her yet? Go on...
9 posted on
07/18/2014 9:44:33 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson