Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Altariel

This is bull squeeze...

The police almost always USED to get the benefit of the doubt, but NO MORE!

Are you telling me an officer going to serve a civil paper warrant shouldn’t have a reasonable expectation that he may encounter a family pet? Should he also prepare himself with non-lethal repellant (pepper spay) just in case?

WTF? This officer is too STUPID to enforce the law but most especially to legally carry a firearm...

Charged my a$$... pets are becoming target practice...


14 posted on 07/17/2014 10:14:53 AM PDT by bfh333 ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bfh333

“The police almost always USED to get the benefit of the doubt, but NO MORE!”

The police should never have gotten any benefit of the doubt *not typically afforded to any other individual, regardless of occupation*.

Period.

That is why we are where we are today.


19 posted on 07/17/2014 10:19:43 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: bfh333
The police almost always USED to get the benefit of the doubt, but NO MORE!

I used to give LEOs the benefit of the doubt: they do a tough job, deal with difficult to dangerous people in all kinds of unpredictable environments. But there's been a change in the last few years: Cops don't act anymore like protectors of the citizenry, but as the enforcers of the state, and that's disturbing. And when coupled with the radical militarization of police forces around the country, the entire business is downright worrisome.

45 posted on 07/17/2014 10:55:43 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson