If owners of the closely-held company refused to pay for all forms of birth control would the court have reached the same decision?
“If owners of the closely-held company refused to pay for all forms of birth control would the court have reached the same decision?”
Apparently so because the Hobby Lobby decision did just that by saying that all, I believe the number was 20, forms of birth control fall under this ruling, not just the 4 originally objected to in the suit.