That is what baffles me...
Here at FR that usually is the mantra (a mantra that I support): if you don’t like it, go somewhere else and work. Period.
Now, some seem to say here that, no, we must force the company to provide blood transfusions even if SCOTUS made its ruling purely on the stance of closely held religious view(s).
It seems as if we have some here that like religious liberty for their church or belief system, but not for others.
Look..no one has to GIVE YOU anything.. employment is a contract between two people.. you and your employer. . So if health insurance is part of the package fine ...if it’s not fine ..if it only has some parts you like and some you don’t fine.
Truth is I really I prefer cash only for employment..
All the benefits like health insurance is really barter beween the two parties....
why the government should dictate that some of your compensation must be in the form of barter and the barter must include certain items is nuts