Posted on 07/10/2014 1:07:16 PM PDT by Morgana
The abortion backer who attacked a pro-life teen in a profane rant captured on video yesterday is defending her actions and has no intention of apologizing.
Pro-life activist Seth Drayer was physically attacked (video below) while leading a group of pro-life students in sharing the pro-life message in downtown Columbus, Ohio today. The video shows a woman in a Burger King shirt attacking the pro-lifers.
createdequal2She says, ““You’re just a white f—— privileged racist f—— male who doesn’t stand for women’s rights.” The abortion advocate adds, “No uterus, no right to talk about it. Understand, Mother f—–?”
The abortion backer has been identified as Victoria Duran and she is seen on video yelling at the protestors and kicking down their signs.
ABC6/FOX28 caught up with Duran hours later and asked her about her actions.
“The first amendment protects them from government interference it doesn’t protect them from people basically telling them they’re idiots. But you assaulted them? Assault I wouldn’t necessarily say shoving them aside and telling them to keep the camera out of my face as assault. You think it’s okay to push people? I believe that I had the right to tel them the did not have my consent to film me,” said Duran.
Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
WARNING: The following video contains graphic images and language.
101 captions I could make up for that..
That is why those that are around these idiots need to carry a fire arm.
If you have ever wondered why it is simply impossible to have reasoned discourse with these people? Wonder, no more.
Well, isn’t it amazing how the pro-abortion...er...”pro-choice” crowd has gone from insisting they have the right to kill their unborn children on demand, to they are entitled to having their unborn children killed at the expense of the tax payer, to they have the right to attack anyone who objects to anything that has to do with their right to murder the unborn?
What next?
Every argument that comes to mind contains the sad conclusion that the tax payer shoulders the expense of promiscuity.
How about “If you can’t afford to be promiscuous, don’t be promiscuous.”?
Can you imagine a conservatives defending themselves in that way if caught in a “macaca moment”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.