Above average intelligence, say 130 or so I can understand, these are bright people who are still sufficiently anchored in the day to day to perceive the world as the world perceives them. Get much beyond 160 or so and “cerebral” is about the best you can do for an adjective. It’s the rare human being who has an extremely high IQ, is athletic, sociable to the point of a winning personality, sexually attractive, etc., the stereotype has a factual basis.
Bill Gates and Paul Allen are examples that support your theory.
“It’s the rare human being who has an extremely high IQ, is athletic, sociable to the point of a winning personality, sexually attractive, etc.,”
Fit that description to a tee..don’t think I’m all that unusual.
BTW you forgot to mention humble.
“It’s the rare human being who has an extremely high IQ, is athletic, sociable to the point of a winning personality, sexually attractive, etc., the stereotype has a factual basis.”
it maybe there is one like that who will pop up and presume to have the answers to save the world...he’ll be called antichrist!(The beast system...Beast...false prophet and Beast Image)
My son is a 169. He lives in his fraternity, is very sociable, and is the starting left tackle. He is rather good looking too, and that is not just my opinion.
I am a 165 and sociable as well ... much more so than my 134 husband who dreads and avoids most social functions. I did make high school varsity for field hockey and my hubby has never played a sport.
So while the stereotype might have some factual basis, it is not absolute.
132 IQ is the 98th percentile.