Do I have to repeat, yet again, my first hand knowledge and evidence
that dogsbite.org deliberately ignores evidence
and knowingly falsifies their statistics?
You’ve surely been around long enough to have seen it before.
__________________________
We’ll I’ve researched the false claims of pit nutters for years and they’re always blatant liars. If you have evidence that dogsbite.org “deliberately ignores evidence” and “falsifies their statistics” I’d appreciate it if you’d post it. I like to be informed and the change would be nice.
This “pit nutter.. and.... blatant liar..”,
has already given up 4 hours of his sleep time on this thread
and is not inclined to give anymore it at the moment particularly to you given your opinion of me.
Be that as it may and for the sake of others...
Short version..
dog attack San Antonio TX attributed to ‘pit bull’
photo in paper raised questions in my mind
called long distance from Canada to San Antonia
able to make contact and speak with Animal Control Officer
who had actually seen the dog in question
she identified the dog as Lab.
Ignorantly thought dogsbite.org was a reputable site
as concerned as I about compiling accurate information.
They had identified the dog as a ‘pit bull’
sent them my report with contact info so they could correct.
To this day they have they have not retracted the false identification
Deliberate ignoring of evidence and knowingly publishing false data.
You may find that behavior acceptable, I don’t.
Once a liar always a liar as far as I’m concerned.
You'd been informed, you just didn't stay informed....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2729645/posts?page=45#45