Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

I like Russell Crowe movies. "A Good Year" is a well-done and entertaining watch. "Cinderella Man" is a well-made Rocky clone, but also a good watch. Crowe's "Robin Hood" is a neat twist on an old story. Many of the others Actors listed I have no use for . . .
1 posted on 06/16/2014 5:27:52 AM PDT by Macoozie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Macoozie

They can always start mouthing off about those damn Conservatives... that’s always good for a couple months free publicity and popularity! :)


2 posted on 06/16/2014 5:32:46 AM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

“Robin Hood” was a tragedy. If you read what the original script was about, then you’ll see just how creatively bankrupt Hollywood is. The “Sheriff of Notthingham” script sounded awesome. “Robin Hood” was OK, but it wasn’t particularly interesting. Such a shame...


4 posted on 06/16/2014 5:35:06 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

There is a lot of empirical evidence that there is no correlation between box office performance and if that movie has A list stars.


5 posted on 06/16/2014 5:44:01 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

A shame for Cruise Edge of Tomorrow is quite good. Oblivion was lightweight and deserved to do poorly. The guy is a good actor in great shape for his age but people are turned off to him. Knight and Day was really good too.


6 posted on 06/16/2014 5:44:32 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

The industry moved away from strong writing and acting, into weak story, weak acting and computer generation.


8 posted on 06/16/2014 5:44:46 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

Fascinating. All eight are male.

Male roles and stars dominate today, whereas back during the horrible days of oppression of women, there were lots of good roles for actresses.

9 of 10 box office draws last year were male.

BTW, Russell Crowe, listed as washed up in this article, was #3.

http://www.deadline.com/2013/12/2013-top-10-international-box-office-stars/


9 posted on 06/16/2014 5:46:26 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

There are only so many ways to repackage Top Gun and Tom Cruise is getting a little old to be a matinee idol. He never was much of an actor anyway, and his personal peculiarities have caught up with him.

Johnny Depp can only play so many pirates and is a weird disaster in anything else. That Tonto thing with the dead bird on his head, what on earth were they thinking?

The industry is losing control, the crowds aren’t materializing, their old formula isn’t working and their stable of “stars” is dwindling. Overt politicization has offended a good percentage. Other avenues of entertainment are cutting into the audience.

I don’t think there will be another Tom Cruise in his heyday, the critical mass is just no longer there to support it, and he really wasn’t all that great to begin with.


10 posted on 06/16/2014 5:47:30 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

You can’t forget Tom Cruise is Tom Cruise. That worked in his favor when people liked who Tom Cruise was, but now we know him as a control-freak, bat-sh!+ insane cultist... not so much.

You also can’t forget Clooney is Clooney. He is still likeable, but he is also boring as an actor; he never seems togo beyond a handsome smile. That served OK as a character actor (Gravity, ER), but makes for a poor lead role.

Likewise, Johnny Depp is a great actor, but a seriously off-putting lead. He’s weird. It’s wonderful for when the role calls for weird ( a perfect match for Tim Burton), but not great as a blockbuster lead. Case in point: His Charlie and the Chocolate Factory nailed Dahl’s novella, but reminded so many people, “No, it’s not just me... this is a disturbing story.”

On the other hand, Matt Damon works as an action hero. He’s likeable, but a bit boring, so he works as an everyman. Put him in something character-driven, and he just doesn’t hold up. And all but a few action-hero movies should be at least somewhat character driven.

Vince Vaughn screams out “douche!” That works great for roles that demand a douche (”Wedding Crashers”), but again... not an action hero.

Collin Ferrel just looks.... dirty. You know what? A lot of these guys are starting to look dirty... Adam Sandler... Vince Vaughn... Johnny Depp...


11 posted on 06/16/2014 5:48:52 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

I can’t go see Edge of Tomorrow because they knocked Emily Blunt down to 2% body fat and are trying to make her an action star. What a waste!


12 posted on 06/16/2014 5:53:35 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (Health Care Haiku: If You Have a Right / To the Labor I Provide / I Must Be Your Slave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie
Only ever heard of four of these guys. And don't care about them, much less the four no-names. Hollywood is not what it used to be.
13 posted on 06/16/2014 5:57:05 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie
I never go the movies to see an actor.
I want to see movies that are good no matter who's in it.
Sometimes good actors know how to choose good scripts and perform really well, which will make them known for being in good movies.
Their name alone does not make it so.
If Hollywood spent more time on the craft and less on marketing, they might have seen that.

14 posted on 06/16/2014 5:58:04 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

Nose-diving? Nose-bleeding is more like it. Usually vile language and digging deeper into more immorality does it for Depp. These popular stars used to be able to make money without soiling one’s spirit by watching them.


15 posted on 06/16/2014 6:01:55 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

CGI has in many ways ruined Hollywood action movies as they tend to over rely on them. The story is not as important, it’s how much action can we pack into it. In the last few years, there were really only two movies (IMO) that I think were really good. That is “The Book Thief” and “The Grand Budapest Hotel”. They were good stories and the biggest actor in either of them is Ralph Fiennes who is not a top tier actor.

I have to say that the best shows are not in the movies any longer. T.V. and especially cable T.V. has some of the most ground breaking stuff out there today.


20 posted on 06/16/2014 6:11:46 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

One word...Redbox.

I don’t do movie-house, $50 ticket & snack excursions anymore. Used to be an enjoyable experience. Used to love an afternoon matinee or a Saturday night “date” with the wife. Not anymore. Nowadays, you deal with jerks on cellphones, or someone chattering with their neighbor the entire movie, or the thump, thump, thump of someone kicking the back of your seat, or groups of gangstas hovering around the theatre entrance.

No thanks. I’ll wait for it to come out on Redbox if I want to see it.

UNLESS...the actor has turned into a public jerk, espousing some sort of crap (liberal) dogma. In that case, there won’t even be a Redbox moment for them with me. They’re off my list.

If the line at the Redbox last night was any indication...a lot of folks feel the same way.


22 posted on 06/16/2014 6:13:45 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

Common theme with most of these guys...they can’t help but spout off about their personal views (usually liberal).


25 posted on 06/16/2014 6:30:42 AM PDT by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

Adam Sandler is perhaps the saddest one.

To paraphrase one of his own movies, nobody want to see a 50 year old guy making pratfalls and telling fart jokes.


27 posted on 06/16/2014 6:38:36 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

“Ghost Protocol” was so laughably, horrifically, inconceivably bad I had to turn it off after the first 45 minutes or so.

If that was the high point of Cruise’s last few films, he is in trouble.

He was superb, though, in “Vanilla Sky.”


29 posted on 06/16/2014 6:43:33 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie
Russell Crowe and Johnny Depp are both great actors.

The problem is that their agents/managers have put them in crummy movies lately. Actors act, they get offered scripts for movies with big payments associated. Sometimes they have to take roles in movies just to pay the bills.

Matt Damon, Vince Vaughn, Adam Sandler, are not good actors. I have never seen an Adam Sandler movie that I thought was funny. Matt Damon is annoying. Vince Vaughn is the same character in every movie.

George Clooney is also a good actor, but many of his movie are just too slow. He is in a lot of chick flicks. He was very good in “The Descendants”.

Tom Cruise needs to stop making action movies. He is too old. The last good movie he made was the one where he played a contract killer. I can not remember the name.

30 posted on 06/16/2014 6:49:35 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

Edge of Tomorrow looks pretty good. Planning to see it.


34 posted on 06/16/2014 6:59:31 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Macoozie

I’d blame mass production. Every single action movie since 2009 has begun with a super-bass sub-woofer rattling everyone’s brain, followed by non-stop CGI that all looks the same. I just ran my DVDs of The Sand Pebbles and the original Flight of the Phoenix. Just pure story-telling and great acting. We don’t see any of this in contemporary films. Bleh. Movie theaters are running on $150M ad campaigns and inertia.


35 posted on 06/16/2014 7:05:48 AM PDT by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson