Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Calvin Locke

Having a rich owner is good for the fans, because the owner is willing to pay for a winning team.


27 posted on 05/31/2014 11:49:46 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
Having a rich owner is good for the fans, because the owner is willing to pay for a winning team.

Sometimes they're willing and sometimes they're not. Often times a losing team is more profitable. Joe Robbie built one of the best football teams ever, but he was relatively poor. You are right that it takes a commitment from the owner to having a winning team.

28 posted on 05/31/2014 12:00:44 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker

The problem is when you have only four or five teams with rich owners, and it squeezes out the smaller teams. A Luxury Tax is nothing to a guy like Ballmer.


32 posted on 05/31/2014 12:23:25 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson