Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: aMorePerfectUnion
WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is not secure as it may contain unfixed security issues. This page exists only to help migrate existing data encrypted by TrueCrypt. The development of TrueCrypt was ended in 5/2014 after Microsoft terminated support of Windows XP. Windows 8/7/Vista and later offer integrated support for encrypted disks and virtual disk images.

This makes no sense whatsoever. I believe what most of the Reddit commentators do. The NSA started twisting arms with secret suponeas to force the addition of a back door. Rather than comply, and they could not reveal the supoenas - that is a serious crime - the developers put out an obviously bogus explanation in order to warn users off the product.

And a recomendation for Bitlocker? From Microsoft? Give me a break!

It reminds me of that scene from breaking bad where Walter is cursing at Skylar for being so ignorant and not knowing about the drug dealing knowing the feds are monitoring the call.

The question is, is 7.1 secure or not?

21 posted on 05/29/2014 8:49:26 PM PDT by expat1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: expat1000

I’m also with the the Reddit folks. The NSA started cloak-and-daggering them, threatening to shut them down if they didn’t put a back door into their code, and instead of complying, they shut down the whole product.

There is an alternate explanation that the NSA found a back door in the current software and told them to NOT patch it or they’ll be shut down. The authors decided to cancel the project instead of continuing to support it, and the message they’ve left is actually true without explanation; but then that would mean that they likely exposed holes for a possible fork to take over the project and patch those holes.

Bitlocker is “secure” for most purposes, but of course, Microsoft’s been cooperating with the federal government since the 80s. I have no doubt that the MS hashes are compromised in some way, even if I can’t prove it. Your only real security left, which is scary, is OpenSSL. Since OpenSSL is protected by the GNU, the federal government is going to have a hard time twisting the arms of millions of contributors to that cause, and given the complexity of OpenSSL, you have to have a decent amount of time and patience to implement it in your own environment.

I’m using OpenSSL in my private network with plenty of honey pots, but that doesn’t mean that some ne’er-do-well couldn’t bang away at my network until they got in. Hell, from what Snowden says, it sounds like most of the goons at the NSA are script kiddies with complicated programs. If those programs don’t work, that leaves the truly competent hackers, who I don’t believe would deign to work for the NSA unless compelled to do so.


34 posted on 05/30/2014 5:22:59 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson