Yes, note that Leftists didain the notion of being driven by the desire to make more money, but then they turn right around and complain that the people who have a drive to make more money, somehow have more money.
Happiness is not money, but a lot of happiness is the ability to be content with what you’ve got. Leftists set themselves up for unhappiness, because they desire to have a lot, but disdain the requirements of attaining it.
Interesting, but common sense, of course liberals will blame sexism, racism, homophobia, etc...
Well, that's the issue, isn't it?
To resolve the question, you have to define the good compared to"richer", in a way that's not a tautology, and that, above all, is something we are not willing to do.
Look at the marriage stats. Fewer women in all groups are getting married. Many educated women will only have one income in their lifetime. They’d better put away all the money they can if they expect to retire.
While the whole issue of “income inequality” is a liberal lie, the actual fact is that Obama has created more actual income inequality by his policies, laws, decisions and exec orders than any president in history.
It’s at the core of all liberalism/progressivism/Marxism (they are the same, differing only in degree) to say one thing while practicing and doing the exact opposite.
Ledbetter ryhmes with bedwetter.