Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dmz

Yeah, you’re right. The Byrds of course worshiped Dylan, and I’m sure he was right there on their opening night along with dozens of others.

Have no clue why Nash would split cause of that. He was the glue of Crosby, Stills, Nash etc. IMHO.

Great comment, not to be down stream from Dylan.

Where do you stop with regards to people doing Dylan’s work. I don’t recall the Beatles ever doing one of his songs, but might be wrong, or Michael Jackson.


58 posted on 05/29/2014 4:11:25 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: nikos1121

As I remember in the liner notes of the CSNY collection I bought a number of years back, Nash wanted to play original music, wasn’t interested in doing covers so much.

As for being the glue, I’d have to give that to Stills. From my recollection, on the records, he played most of the instruments and had about a creative 18 months of writing songs as anyone has had in rock n roll.


61 posted on 05/29/2014 4:46:24 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson