Apparently he is going to sell the team. He may have received legal advice to the effect he had no real defense to the league action.
I agree, he probably had no recourse pertaining to selling the team.
1.) Selling the team, and then attending Clippers games - I could see how he could be kept from attending said games.
2.) Selling the team while attending no Clippers games: I can’t see how that is enforceable, even if it were within a clause.
How could it be “reasonable” to put #2 within the contract?