Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cmwy
leaders that were not in it to win it...
I think that fueled more of the anti-war sentiment among the young than people today realize. It was clear by 1971 that the war had descended into a stalemate that could not be won without attacking North Viet Nam directly, which politics prevented. A lot of us, myself included, did not want to die in the quagmire of a ‘limited’ war. There should be no such thing. I got drafted and served, albeit reluctantly.
40 posted on 05/23/2014 12:39:07 PM PDT by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Old North State
It was clear by 1971 that the war had descended into a stalemate ...
1971? Walter Cronkite came back from VN, after the Tet Offensive in early 1968, and told America, "To say that we are mired in stalemate seems the only realistic, yet unsatisfactory, conclusion."
45 posted on 05/23/2014 12:47:08 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Old North State
I think that fueled more of the anti-war sentiment among the young than people today realize. It was clear by 1971 that the war had descended into a stalemate that could not be won without attacking North Viet Nam directly, which politics prevented. A lot of us, myself included, did not want to die in the quagmire of a ‘limited’ war.

What you just posted is something that no one wants to remember, because it is easier to just parrot the line about "youth" and "hippies", etc.

Those of us who lived through the times remember how people, including the young, were baffled by the nation's leaders and the way we were not fighting the war, eventually, many naturally wanted nothing to do with the unexplained war with no seeming purpose or goal, or end, we wouldn't even bomb the enemy, it was just year, after year, after year of half war, bloody combat, but with no seeming goal or purpose except to maintain an equilibrium between maintaining constant combat, while also maintaining the enemy's ability to fight us.

Fighting the Vietnamese was to be fighting a first class enemy, it was a true and bloody war with horrible conditions, in time it came to seem that people were merely being cycled through their time in the endless war, for no apparent purpose, as though it had become a habit for the politicians, it became clear that whatever unseen purpose it was serving for the politicians, that they weren't interested in defeating the enemy and that they kept stopping before delivering the death blow.

Look at these polls, the young were the strongest supporters of the war, and clearly the older people were mystified by the way it was not being fought, for instance leaving the north alone, and their harbors, and fighting for ground and then abandoning it.

Look at the over 49 age group, the WWII fighting age group, look at how quickly they changed in their support for the war.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

61 posted on 05/23/2014 1:13:59 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson