Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MrShoop

“I think you may be misunderstanding what they are saying. You said everyone has to update Windows 8.1 Update 1 for security patches. That is inaccurate. I’m using Windows 7, and I don’t need to upgrade. They are just saying if you are using WIndows 8.1, you need update to 8.1 Update 1. That is totally reasonable”

I’m not misunderstanding at all. And stopping ALL patches for Windows 8.x users with two weeks notice that such patch-halting will happen if you don’t install Update 1 just a couple of weeks after it was released is completely unreasonable.

This announcement has created havoc amongst tens of thousands of enterprise businesses that take months and months before they can roll out a patch to thousands on inhouse PCs and/or to test software products they deliver into the marketplace.

If the enterprise had pretty much decided to skip 8.x, this little gem of a decision has pretty much iced the cake on that decision.


27 posted on 05/16/2014 2:40:39 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: catnipman
OK, I thought you misunderstood, now I know you misunderstood. But Microsoft is at fault for not clearly communicating the plan.

To be clear, users of Windows 8, Windows 7, and Windows Vista will continue to get security patches. The update requirement only applies to Windows 8.1 users

30 posted on 05/16/2014 4:54:15 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson