Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

I’ll take Reagan at his word, unless you have something that proves otherwise. Maybe he changed his mind after her comments about him being beholden to the religious right. Maybe not. Maybe he was a man who said what he meant and meant what he said. Hey, at least you learned something about Reagan and Rand that you weren’t aware of before. Glad I could help.


51 posted on 05/15/2014 2:51:54 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Mase

I won’t take you at your word, if you are going to try and twist about the blandest thank you note that we have ever seen from a candidate, into a ringing endorsement of Ayn Rand.

Reagan was no libertarian, and so far, you haven’t proven he was a true admirer of Ayn Rand.

“”Dear Mr. Vandersteel:
Thanks very much for the pamphlet. Am an admirer of Ayn Rand but hadn’t seen this study.
Sincerely, Ronald Reagan””

Now do you have more comments from Reagan on Ayn Rand, or is that sad little note from 1966, it?


52 posted on 05/15/2014 3:01:19 PM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson