Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: digger48
...their fundamental right to marry...

can someone help me out here?

Where does this right exist? Is it in a law, codebook, constitution, rule, or something? Because it looked like Idaho actually had a LAW against it so if this right exists elsewhere it must trump the law as written.

And "fundamental"; where did that come from? Does that make it more of a right than other rights? While at least one man I know of who transported a firearm thru New Jersey to take to his legally allowed home in another state languishes in jail and his 2nd Amendment rights are blatantly violated?

Maybe Judge Candy could set him free, I mean, as long as she's now enumerating Fundamental rights...

Somebody call Claire Wolf, because I think the time is now!

7 posted on 05/13/2014 5:44:54 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alas Babylon!

exactly, there is no right to marry, if there was you wouldn’t need a license to do it.


9 posted on 05/13/2014 5:50:41 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

Ummm, the judge in Virginia confused the Constitution and the DOI. These people are idiots. They don’t need no stinkin’ facts!


22 posted on 05/13/2014 6:24:50 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!
can someone help me out here?

Homosexuals, like heterosexuals, have the identical right to marry - that is, to form a legally-recognized relationship with a member of the opposite sex.

33 posted on 05/13/2014 6:41:13 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

I think SCOTUS established marriage as a “fundamental right” in a case allowing prisoners to marry. But I can’t remember more than that - will have to look it up.


35 posted on 05/13/2014 6:48:41 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Alas Babylon!

It’s another case of the federal judges uses the 14th amendment as a battering ram to destroy the 10th amendment or whatever law they want. A federal judge already had the gall to declare Utah’s own constitution unconstitutional because it supposedly “violated the 14th amendment.”

Basically the 14th amendment is being used to do whatever liberal federal judges want. They don’t give a rip about any of the rest.

They’ve been using it to protect Anchor babies or laws against them. It’s basically an amendment giving special rights to all depravities.


56 posted on 05/13/2014 9:18:22 PM PDT by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson