To: BenLurkin
So, we are basically back to the early Apollo days. Yippee...
8 posted on
05/10/2014 12:12:32 PM PDT by
tcrlaf
(Q)
To: tcrlaf
We want to get up there somehow, and I guess there's no sense in reinventing the wheel.
9 posted on
05/10/2014 12:15:04 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: tcrlaf
So, we are basically back to the early Apollo days. Yippee...
I wouldn't say that. If the goal is a space-taxi then a capsule is a good way to go. Remember that the Shuttle was more of a semi-truck to space. It never really worked out as planned, it had severe design flaws that resulted in the loss of two vehicles and 14 crew, and after Challenger was lost its two main raison-d'etres (hauling up commercial satellite payloads and NRO spysats) evaporated in favor of less risky options.
The truth is, unless (until?) we go for a single-stage to orbit spacecraft, capsules (or small winged vehicles like the X-37 and DreamCatcher) and expendable boosters provide the best value for the money.
To: tcrlaf
Despite the Apollo 1 fire Apollo 13 and the Apollo program was a huge success. Stick with what works. Can’t wait till we’re back in the business of launching humans from the Cape again.
14 posted on
05/10/2014 1:12:17 PM PDT by
NCC-1701
(I am proud of what America USED TO BE.)
To: tcrlaf
My thoughts exactly “And Islamic ! has cleared the tower”
17 posted on
05/10/2014 2:54:46 PM PDT by
al baby
(Hi MomÂ…)
To: tcrlaf
I would have figured by this time we would have something like this to ferry stuff back and forth to orbit. What's taking so long?!?
20 posted on
05/10/2014 3:01:18 PM PDT by
CapnJack
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson