Did you actually READ my post and UNDERSTAND IT, or just spewing more of your usual bullbleep? I submit that it’s the latter.
A.) Homosexuals HAVE SERVED in our armed forces since AT LEAST 1775. Mostly they served as honorably as the next man. Some served heroically. We would have a real difficult time telling who was a homo and who was not in these cases, as they DID NOT REVEAL THEMSELVES AS HOMOSEXUALS. To them, service was more important than so-called sexual identity.
B.) The ones who outed themselves were rightly kicked out of the service.
See the difference now? Those in A.) served and I have no issue with it. Those in B.) we are better off without, as their sexual identity is their overriding concern in life, an attitude which can get folks killed dead.
Your post is a contradiction between incredible praise, and condemnation, knowing how they performed, yet not knowing who they were, “”Mostly they served as honorably as the next man. Some served heroically. We would have a real difficult time telling who was a homo and who was not in these cases, as they DID NOT REVEAL THEMSELVES AS HOMOSEXUALS.””
I don’t know where you get all this data, if we didn’t know who they were.
So you want the government to return to it’s non-libertarian position of forbidding them to serve, and kicking them out when they are discovered, so you aren’t libertarian on that issue, neither am I.