Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network

You don’t spend large amount of anything on potential. You spend it on probable.

EMP has far less science behind it that most other fads people demand everyone else follow.


28 posted on 05/09/2014 8:36:28 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

I agree with the poster in 30.

However I also tend to being concerned with this issue. So I also tend to remain concerned with this.

It appears to me, the military is prepared for EMP, but the civilian population is not.


31 posted on 05/09/2014 8:50:20 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad
You don’t spend large amount of anything on potential. You spend it on probable. EMP has far less science behind it that most other fads people demand everyone else follow.

Then why has it been something the military spends money on and has for many decades, both in enhancing EMP weapons, and in hardening against EMPs?

32 posted on 05/09/2014 9:00:30 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson