To: Vaquero
By property I don’t necessarily mean real estate. A healthy portfolio either defered retirement or not should be one form of required property. One advantage of requiring the voter to own real property (a home, a business, etc), is that he directly and immediately stands to lose if the people he votes for adversely affect the business climate or property values in his area.
64 posted on
05/09/2014 7:33:28 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: PapaBear3625; Vaquero
By property I don’t necessarily mean real estate. A healthy portfolio either defered retirement or not should be one form of required property. One advantage of requiring the voter to own real property (a home, a business, etc), is that he directly and immediately stands to lose if the people he votes for adversely affect the business climate or property values in his area.
I agree with all of these.
66 posted on
05/09/2014 8:50:24 AM PDT by
verga
(When protestants post scripture I am reminded that even the devil can quote scripture.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson