Big claims require big proof.
This figure tells a significant amount about the assassination but before you can interpret what it says you must understand why it is valid.
As shown previously, there are two shots in the Zapruder film that are easily tied to frame numbers:
1. Z frame 224, right after Connally emerges from behind the Stemmons freeway sign sign
2. Z frame 313: JFK is shot in the head.
The time between 1 and 2 is calculated by determining the number of frames and noting the camera speed was about 18.3 frames per second.
Time between two of the shots in the Z film is (313 - 224)/18.3 = about 4.8 seconds
As you look at the figure of the analysis of the Dallas police radio recording, you'll see the time between shots #3 and #4 is also 4.8 seconds! Obviously if the Dallas police radio does have the sounds of the shots then the time between shots would match the Zapruder film. Nothing could be simpler than that.
If you do a google of 4.8 seconds and look for the match between the Zapruder film having that time between shots AND the Dallas police radio recording (frequently called the acoustical evidence) you won't find much except what I have written.
If this match exists and this is the most written about and studied murder in history, how could 4.8 seconds in both the Z film and the acoustical evidence not be investigated? The answers to that question and many more are available BUT first you have to understand why it can be said with certainty that the Dallas police radio recording did record the sounds of the shots.
Many contend the acoustical experts working for the House Select Comm. on Assassinations in 1978 were looking at random noise. But they found 4.8 seconds between two of the echo patterns that they determined looked like shots! If that doesn't look like it is important, turn in your badge and go to sleep. You'll never understand it.
What is the probability that the audio experts in 1978 would find two shot like patterns 4.8 seconds if they were looking at random noise? The microphone was keyed approximately 5 minutes (or 300 seconds). Because the Z film and the audio tape have a useful resolution of about 0.1 seconds, that means there would be 3000 intervals.
You'll also notice that all of the shot like echo patterns occur less than 10 seconds from the first to the last one.
BJ Clinton had trouble with the definition of what "IS" is. The JFK research/peanut gallery have trouble with the definition of AND. When you say AND, you multiply probabilities together to get the overall probability of both of these events occurring.
In this case, probability that we'd get 4.8 seconds between two of the shots AND all of the shots would be grouped within 10 seconds is:
Overall probability: (1/3000) X (10 seconds/300 seconds) which means getting both of these things simultaneously if the audio experts were looking at random noise is not very probable.
But remember AND! The figure shows the last two shots were fired a split second apart, BANG-BANG. My video shows several witnesses who said the last two shots were BANG-BANG. What is the probability of that happening if that was only one shot fired at the end of the shooting? If you buy the gubermint's explanation of an echo, why didn't the first two shots echo?
You probably know the acoustical evidence indicated shot #4 on the figure was fired from in front of JFK. IF so, then some witnesses would have seen a large exit wound in the rear of JFK's head. If you are even remotely familiar with the JFK assassination, you know the doctors and nurses at Parkland Hospital say they saw a large wound in the right rear of JFK's head.
Then we have to factor in that Secret Service agents in both Dallas and Bethesda in Washington also describe a large exit wound in the right rear of JFK's head.
ETC. When you use the definition of AND and you multiply these other factors you determine that the probability that the sounds were recorded on the Dallas Police radio recording are astronomical. Not large but astronomical.
What does this mean? Looking at the figure with the last two shots fired BANG-BANG, it means that a conspiracy killed JFK as the person in the Texas School Book depository could not have fired both shots. It also means that it is impossible that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK. Not improbable but impossible.
So why did the US government hide the truth in 1963/64 and why is 4.8 seconds and BANG-BANG still not talked about today? You might suspect the conspiracy was run from high in the US government. The FBI collected all of the Dallas evidence and took it to Washington. If evidence was forged, and the acoustical evidence proves it was, it means the US government forged evidence to hide the truth.
And why is this important today? Simply because if you can pull off the JFK assassination and get away with it, you can tell any lie you want to. But they don't have to fool individual citizens, they only have to fool the presstitutes. When Hussein Obama lies you to you, he knows there will be no real criticism because of the JFK assassination and how the presstitutes failed miserably in doing their Constitutional function, report the truth and hold the government acountable. The US government has a license to lie no matter what their agenda is and the presstitutes and therefore the public are powerless to stop them.