Well, again, you support your assertions with nothing just flat conclusory statements. Failing to convince you is not the same as failing to present an argument based on facts or evidence.
In a civil case, normally the one with the most evidence wins. Here, I've offered a tonnage of facts and examples compared to basically nothing but assertions from you. So on that objective basis I've won the argument regardless of whether you're subjectively convinced.
You also might want to ask yourself, what do you have to offer as alternatives. Many here are very good at shooting down ideas without offering alternatives or why the status quo should be maintained. Rarely is maintaining the status quo a stronger argument than improving things and usually shooting down suggested improvements without offering any of your own is not very helpful.
God Bless and Good Luck trying to make any changes.