Why do support flat-earth/religious fundamental deniers against true scientists? Do you believe in evolution? But real scientists claim… (and it’s neighbor) “All true scientists believe ..” And would you support the Inquisition against true scientists like Galileo? When was the earth created? Why do you oppose teaching evolution in school? Do you believe in the Big Bang? No real scientist can deny … If you believe in God/the Bible/religion you cannot be allowed to …
Now, I know how I've answered these in the past.
But which ones have I missed? How would you answer each? How have you answered these in-your-face denials by our so-called "elite" scribes and Pharisees of today's colleges and paid government universities?
Interestingly, there’s never a set amount of effort that will suffice in these plans. It’s always a recommendation to do more, and to let governments, preferably thru international coordination, restrict industry, restrict fuel and land use, and collect additional taxes.
My favorite is Algore’s claim about a decade ago that the island of Vanuato is sinking.
But not to long ago I saw House Hunters International show where a an Australian couple were house shopping there. The island looked just fine — and they didn’t seem to have any qualms about buying property on the island.
It is concave with it's concavity facing the sun.
That's why it's getting so hot!
We need to get the people at the ends of the Earth to start pushing down the edges.
Global Warming Petition Project
31,487 American scientists have signed this petition, including 9,029 PHDs.
3. But CO2′s harmful effect on the climate is basic physics/has been an established fact since the 1890′s/has been known since Arrhenius first theories 120 years ago?
Where is the hot spot in the upper atmosphere?
No smoking hot spot1. The greenhouse signature is missing. We have been looking and measuring for years, and cannot find it.
Each possible cause of global warming has a different pattern of where in the planet the warming occurs first and the most. The signature of an increased greenhouse effect is a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmosphere for decades using radiosondes: weather balloons with thermometers that radio back the temperature as the balloon ascends through the atmosphere. They show no hot spot. Whatsoever.
If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming. If we had found the greenhouse signature then I would be an alarmist again.
2. Don’t you understand that 97% of “real scientists” agree that CO2 is a dangerous/is harming the environment/is affecting the climate/is humanity’s most serious threat to life around the world?
6. But we MUST act NOW (against CO2) BECAUSE fossil fuels are running out/peak oil-peak natural gas-peak horse manure …
Actually, “climate change” is an inexorable juggernaut; Earth has been in the past much hotter and much colder, and will be again much hotter and much colder. The colder periods, know as “ice ages,” are end of life events.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.