Anyone who didn’t see this one coming just wasn’t looking.
In our country’s recent history we’ve celebrated diversity in our population as if it were a good thing, but one look at world history will show you that no country with a diverse population of different races, languages, and religion has long survived.
Countries don’t naturally form with a diverse population, and when in the past they’ve occurred it’s usually been as a result of armed conquest. These unnaturally formed countries have either melded together into a single population made up of one mixed race with one language and one religion or they’ve come apart, and they’ve usually come apart with extreme violence. The longer these diverse populations are forced to coexist with one another without mixing and becoming one, the more the hatred grows among them and the more violently they break apart, but break apart they will, or genocide will settle the issue once and for all.
I wouldn’t even say it’s a matter of different races or language or even religion.
It’s more a matter of the values....We can have people of different languages and races, even religions (assuming they are based on Judeo-Christian values). But if the value systems are vastly different, then no country will be able to survive it.
And the fact of the matter is, that what is considered “black culture” that these ferals subscribe to, is not compatible with Western Civilization.
Interesting thoughts. However, one must reckon with the idea of an objectively true religion that applies to all people (as literal descendants of Adam and Eve). I know that many cultural/civilizational conservatives reject this in favor of religion as the creation of a particular culture, meaning there is one for each one. This of course is not in any degree orthodox or fundamental religion.
Another point to be considered is that in this case the offending population is not a recent foreign invader but has been part of the warp and woof of American life since at least 1619. Surely they can't have been Profound Left Wing Intellectuals for all this time. As a matter of fact, at one time (hard to remember, perhaps) it was Blacks rather than rednecks who were the stereotyped simple-minded religion bumpkins.
When did this large and native population become something foreign and hostile? When did they become more culturally alienated than any other group, including ones fresh off the boat from other countries? Why did white leftists anoint them as the absolute pinnacle of the hierarchy of alienation and righteous indignation, towering over culturally and historically far more alien groups? Booker T. Washington had a standard speech entitled "Let Down Your Bucket Where You Are" in which he encouraged whites to turn to the familiar Black community rather than strange and alien peoples for advancement and investment.
All these questions may seem rhetorical, but I would really like to know just when and where all these changes were made. Maybe some day there'll be a history, though I doubt it.
Finally, if Blacks are indeed the most hostile, "foreign," and "alien" group now in the country (and they do seemed to have morphed into this because this is certainly how they act now), then why are the white Southern slave owners who imported them considered the ultimate paragons of conservatism? This is something I have never understood. Blacks are derided by many on the right while their importers are practically worshiped. If Blacks have really been an underground vanguard of Revolutionary Left Wing Intellectuals for all this time, then what does that make their aristocratic white planter sponsors?
Why didn't wealthy whites just enslave poor whites? Surely there were plenty of them to be had from English prisons and poor farms. I can't help but wonder that if this had been the case, would anyone even make a big deal of slavery at all.
Just thinking out loud, I guess.
Pinging wideawake in case I am misunderstood.