Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vetvetdoug

IMO, Taylors stand up to anything on the market for tonal quality, feel and action.

The only brand I’ve found to be better than taylor was from a boutique Luther shop in California. I want to say it was called a Santa Rosa, but am not certain. I only played it once about 15 years ago. Incredible instrument with an incredibility high price.


59 posted on 04/24/2014 12:54:12 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Rebelbase

Santa Cruz?


61 posted on 04/24/2014 2:15:54 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Rebelbase

It seems with acoustic guitars that you really do get what you pay for, more so than electrics. I have a Sigma acoustic (basically a licensed copy of a OO-style Martin) that cost around $180 new, which I never play because the action is terrible and no amount of fiddling with the saddle will fix it. And the main reason I haven’t replaced it yet is because I’ve yet to find another acoustic I like with a price under $3,000.

For the record, that figure is about twice what I paid for my PRS.


67 posted on 04/25/2014 7:46:07 AM PDT by ZirconEncrustedTweezers (I'm not anti-government, government's anti-me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson