Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SgtHooper

HUH? The Feds control FAR too much real estate. There is a very good reason to sell a big chunk of it, and make it productive.


33 posted on 04/16/2014 7:30:59 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

“The feds control FAR too much real estate. ....sell...and make it productive.”

Like I said before, fix the dam govey entities before we hand it over to others. The feds are a prime example of how certain people really screw things up. That would be no different if selling 1 million acres to some big company or country from which to make a profit. It would likely still be screwed up!

Having specific vast portions of land just sitting for the beauty, enjoyment, and posterity is fine with me. For example, beautiful mountains do not need be chopped up for ski slopes (and I like to ski), chalets, and all that crap, so people can make a buck. The beauty is natural and should stay that way. Our national parks are no different. Leave em alone.

As you must know by now, Dingy Harry purportedly wants to make Bundy’s land productive, with a solar project. This would be a prime example of why we do not just hand over land for “production”.


47 posted on 04/16/2014 9:29:47 PM PDT by SgtHooper (I lost my tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson