To: SgtBob
We DO NOT need a constitutional convention! That is a sure-fire way to lose what little we have. We need to abide by and enforce what we have. It works.
9 posted on
04/15/2014 4:44:59 PM PDT by
ronnyquest
(I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of liberty only to see marxism elected at home.)
To: ronnyquest
#16 is especially designed just for you.
18 posted on
04/15/2014 5:02:17 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(We have met the enemy and he is us.)
To: ronnyquest
Educate yer damned self! 34 States HAVE NOT signed on to a Constitutional Convention! They ARE considering an Article V Convention of the States.
READ THE CONSTITUTION!
Don’t mean to yell, but after yesterday, stoopid posts need it.
29 posted on
04/15/2014 5:35:13 PM PDT by
SgtBob
(Freedom is not for the faint of heart. Semper Fi!)
To: ronnyquest
I must respectfully disagree. We need a CoS desperately. We are very late. And not because there is anything wrong with the current constitution, the wrong lies in the federal government itself and the people who make it up. The overall intent of the CoS is to empower the states to reign in the federal government and force it to follow the constitution. It’s that simple, to abide by and enforce the constitution. Just as you stated.
44 posted on
04/15/2014 6:41:12 PM PDT by
Nuc 1.1
(Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson