First of all, I’m sorry you’re so paranoid as to think there was some kind of sinister point - some kind of way to try and detract from UConn. You should go back to bed for a couple more hours.
<><><><><
All for asking you what your point was? Had you made your point clear in your initial post, you wouldn’t get these types of posts in return.
Consider it constructive feedback on your writing skills (apparently I wasnt the only one to fail to see your point).
Have a nice day, sir.
That’s perhaps true…..my main point was that ESPN’s Mike and Mike were clueless as to what had led UConn’s amazing rise from nowhere to 4 titles in 16 years…..and their employer ESPN was one of the main factors…along with the Big East in general, hiring the right coach, and then the right replacment coach, the right womens coach, and using UCONN as the marketing moniker. I think you take any of that away, and the results are very different.
It will be interesting to see if they can stay at this level with this new smaller conference.