“I’m wondering how you can post this with a straight face! ... “and those qualities have been determined experimentally to not be present.””
Because it’s true. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. If there is an ether that transmits a push force, it needs to have qualities allowing it to do so, and we have experimentally verified that an ether with those qualities doesn’t exist. You can propose another ether, but without those qualities, it can’t account for gravity.
“First, you won’t even read a new way of approaching the issues, a way that has been around in proposition since Maxwell’s quaternian equations.”
I read your summary and explained to you that something being theoretically possible according to the mathematics is not the same as being physically possible. You previously talked about there being a “proof” of these ideas you are advocating, but that is a mathematical concept, not a physical one. In physics, a mathematical proof is just the first step. If experimental verification is not forthcoming, then that proof is worthless.
“I would direct you to the source of that assertion regarding patents, but since you’re not interested I won’t.”
Yes, please spare me. I’m still waiting for you to provide any experimental verification of the ideas you are advocating. Until you can come up with that, don’t bother sending me anything else.
My my, from your self-appointed lofty perch you are waiting. Bwahaha I see no point to waste any more time with you. Bye bye
‘Yes, please spare me. I’m still waiting for you to provide any experimental verification of the ideas you are advocating. Until you can come up with that, don’t bother sending me anything else.’
Like Eddingtons?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_general_relativity