Anyone not realizing that research and the peer review process has been seriously corrupted, isn't paying attention.
Evidence commonly varies in quality, and there are few instances in which even expert publications are utterly devoid of self interest, bias, and error. Of course, these defects apply not just to evidence on the side one dislikes, but also to the side that one prefers. Even if, as Samuel Johnson famously pointed out, no one but a blockhead writes for any reason except money, in the end, there is no substitute for studying the evidence, good and bad, favorable and unfavorable.