Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ronald_Magnus

For many years I’d heard about _Deliverance_, usually in the company of men who referenced it in a darkly joking manner, chuckled nervously, and then changed the subject as though something truly horrible were being avoided. I long wondered why so many men have found this movie deeply disturbing. Having now seen it, I understand: it brilliantly shows how easily the male ego can be horribly crushed, and how easily one can die stupidly. Perhaps it is a rare movie that shows men the fear women are familiar with.

For the last decade my wife has been tempted to watch it, just to discover what I did about it. While I agree it’s well done, it’s deeply disturbing and not something you want ingrained in your subconscious.


127 posted on 03/25/2014 6:50:54 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
I've read the novel Deliverance and saw the movie. But I never really understood the homo-eroticism until I was a grown man.

The book goes into great detail about the Burt Reynolds character's muscled arms and sinewed chest.

The movie goes one better.

It's probably the gayest movie of the 70s without coming out and slapping you across the face.

I'd wager that 99% of the 1972 audience didn't pick up on that theme, though.

They were plenty uncomfortable, but didn't really grasp why it bothered them so much.

Someone from 2014 would see it plain as day.

136 posted on 03/25/2014 7:05:15 PM PDT by boop (I just wanted a President. But I got a rock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson