Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

The title is not wrong in any way.
The two are by no means incompatible.

They could be considered opposites in the way “Shirt” and “Wool” are opposites. Just because something is made of wool does not mean it can not be a shirt at the same time.

So too with the terms “Prostitute” and “Slave.”

Prostitute means that sex is being performed for material benefit. Slave means a human’s body is controlled by another.

While one may fit only one of the two descriptors, it has sadly been common that both applied to the same individual. Kind of like there have been a lot of wool shirts over the centuries.


6 posted on 03/25/2014 12:27:50 PM PDT by MrEdd (vHeck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MrEdd

It says she was “ex-prostituted” not “ex-prostitute” That kinda implies she was prostituted out by someone else. This same article also talks of a “brothel” so I’m assuming it applies to this woman. Now days women who are in brothels are held against their will as sex slaves. This is not the image of “Gunsmoke” with Miss Kitty running the show. This is a place where women are caged like animals and used only for sex.


9 posted on 03/25/2014 1:50:43 PM PDT by Morgana (Wagglebee please come home we miss you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson