[Fuzz]

As so often happens, we’re talking past one another here.

Let’s clear this up.

You seem to think it’s NOT ok for a science program to show ‘bias’ against religion and it’s NOT ok for a religious program to show ‘bias’ against science. When these two views of the world are in conflict, what would you recommend happen?

[Heartlander]

No - you are trying to evade and frame a different argument. Again, you asked if 'I believe it’s OK for a religious program to be biased against science?' - I asked where I said this and you did not answer.

You changed the subject and stated It’s obviously the inverse of what you appeared to be incredulous about. If one expects a science show to give religious arguments a fair hearing, wouldn’t it be important for religious programs to offer scientific arguments that may go against their particular religious teachings? And, in fact, Universities do this...

So now you change the argument without answering or acknowledging - fine. Now you ask, When these two views of the world are in conflict, what would you recommend happen?

I will be kind enough to answer your question although you avoid answers. World views should be a side note to science. Science today has been hijacked by atheism - anyone who loves science should not sit idly and allow this to happen. An agnostic stance would not be an issue but science should not distort data to make it fit an atheistic narrative and then pretend that atheism is immune to criticism.

We can see how this bias has made people avoid the show by looking at the posts on this thread. This does not advance science.

Now let's see if you can actually answer a question. Do you believe that your mind was ultimately formed by mindlessness - lacking any intelligence?