How can “a blur of a person” “[rush] past the office”, unidentified, when the staff member responsible for buzzing the person in has to *look and see who is at the door*?
Moreover, the parent was seen and identified by another teacher by name and conversed with the parent (briefly) apparently without incident or cause for alarm.
The notion that someone can be “a blur” and rush in unidentified is nonsensical.
But thank you for doing your part to “break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities.”
How are you coming on explaining how a parent checking on her own child is a danger to other children?
Everyone is buzzed in at the door. The purpose of the buzzing in is not for identification - it’s to stop direct and unhindered access to the rest of the school - and - to alert the office that someone is coming inside.
It’s at the office that a person will be checked to see - according to the legal documents, whether they are to have access or not. That cannot be done at the door.
In my case, the mother is “recognizable” at the school by several of the personnel there, but she cannot gain access without me. Now, even though she’s recognizable - it’s ONLY the office which has those documents to verify that. All the school personnel are not in the position to know that.